Friday, May 10, 2013

Teacher Gets Taught!

Bravo to this young man, named Jeff Bliss, that had the guts to speak his mind to a "teacher".
He was totally fed up by Ms. Phung giving out another unimaginative packet of worksheets for the class to fill out instead of actually teaching a lesson to the class.
Kids need enthusiasm and inspiration from their teachers.



When a student like this - who is obviously craving for educational challenge and takes a stand for his right to learn - speaks out, it is the responsibility for us all to listen. We should be aware of the nonsense passing for "education" in our government schools. Thank goodness another student recorded this because we all need to see and hear this. It's just too bad that the rest of the class did not follow this young man out of the classroom.

Teachers like this - and students like Jeff - are the reason why homeschooling should be an unhindered (free) and viable option. I truly hope that this young man never changes his desire to question, to take a stand and to speak out!

After the above video went viral... the News picked up the story:



Thursday, May 9, 2013

Joe Biden's Gun Advice To Women

Now ladies.. listen up - our VP has some sage advice for you regarding self defense.. and I have found this wonderful video to help demonstrate.




Thanks Joe... women of America have truly learned something :)

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Forget Drones - Here Come Bugbots!

How's this for a Minority Report future?



I can see some legitimate applications for this technology - but in the wrong hands it will be insufferable.
However - that video has lots of "May do this" sort of language.. but we get what the ultimate goal is for this type of technology.

Here's the REAL one being funded by the Air Force. http://www.tech­ject.com/dragonf­ly.html
Techjet was actually looking into selling them for about $200 a piece.

It's all not too far from this:



Monday, May 6, 2013

Obama Says - Don't Listen To Them ... Listen To Me

Graduates of Ohio State University were treated to a speech by King... I mean, President, Obama... where he spoke to them about rejecting the voices they hear warning them of tyranny.



These are the same students who will be spending the next 10-15 years struggling to pay off Federal Government backed student loans, paying higher taxes to Federal and State coffers, and paying for Obamacare, while adhering to an array of other laws meant to control and restrict their lives. Chances are many of these graduates won't even be able to find work - except for retail or menial service jobs - and may even be reduced to working for the government.

Yeah... so while they are being made slaves to the State, Obama advises them to reject any notion of tyranny... how interesting... and in the same breath he says they should take responsibility for their own lives.. which really means obey the State and work hard to pay your tribute.

So tell me - where is this "self-rule" that Obama speaks of? We are told where and what to smoke, how much soda we can have, what vaccines we must pump into our bodies, that we have no choice in knowing what's in our GMO laden food, who we can marry, what kinds of toilets we can purchase, whether we can collect rainwater, and on and on and on...

In the meantime, government has demonstrated how easily martial law is instituted, having innocent people and their homes searched without warrants, complete with armed tanks rolling down American city streets, and guns pointed at American homes as they continue the growing militarization of local law enforcement. All the while they demand citizen compliance and acceptance of these police actions. All of this, of course, is funded by the very taxes we all slave to pay! It should also be noted that the Federal government is in the process of stockpiling millions of rounds of ammunition, while summarily trying to disarm American citizens with Obama's anti-gun agenda.

So yeah, Class of 2013.... just ignore those voices which warn you of tyranny... and tyrannical controlling government policies... just move along.. nothing to see here... and by all means ... "don't gum up the works".







Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Testimony On The Immigration Bill

Illegal Immigration still is a huge problem for this country... mostly because our laws are not being enforced and we have an administration which seems to be purposefully ignoring our laws and even promoting illegal immigration in many ways.. we even have "sanctuary cities". And now, in some places illegal aliens are able to get drivers licenses, and soon may be able to serve on juries. No doubt they have been voting in elections as well.

It is out of control!

Here is testimony from Chris Crane, ICE Officer and President of the National ICE Council representing our nation's ICE officers, agents and staff. Crane is also a former marine.




Gang of Eight
in the Senate:
The Gang of Eight members are John McCain, Marco Rubio, Dick Durbin, Lindsey Graham, Michael Bennet, Chuck Schumer, Robert Menendez and Jeff Flake.

Thursday, April 25, 2013

What is CISPA?

Here is a great explanation of the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA)




It's not good.

The legislation was introduced on November 30, 2011 by U.S. Representative Michael Rogers (R-MI) and 111 co-sponsors. It was passed in the House of Representatives on April 26, 2012, but was not passed by the U.S. Senate. President Obama's advisers have argued that the bill lacks confidentiality and civil liberties safeguards and they advised him to veto it. In February 2013 the House reintroduced the bill and passed it on April 18, 2013. (Read more on Wikipedia)

I hope it gets stopped in the Senate.

Again, we must contact our Senators and tell them to vote against it.

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Incredible Declaration From CT Legislator


Listen to 3:09 - "Police and Military have GREATER rights than citizens!" (Rep. David Yaccarino)



Just unbelievable!

and Rep. Yaccarino said our "guns are not being taken away from us"..
Well, that may be technically true in a sense, but we no longer have the right to buy many models of firearms which are in common use and we are restricted (infringed) in using firearms and full magazines to protect ourselves in public.

Physically - what did this bill take away from us?
The ability to protect ourselves against criminals who will not obey the laws, and who will use firearms and magazine capacity that lawful citizens will be restricted from having.

Clearly, Rep Yaccarino and Sen. Fasano do NOT understand the concept of infringed.

And by the way, the anti-gun people will be coming back for more next session - they have already said this. What will Fasano and Yaccarino capitulate on next time?

Vote them out!

One Way To Resist Tyranny


Mike Vanderboegh speaks in Hartford 4-20-13


"FOR SILENCE IN THE FACE OF TYRANNY IMPLIES CONSENT -- 
AND I DO NOT CONSENT!"



Thursday, April 18, 2013

Lying News - Garbage News


Seriously, when catastrophe and mayhem occur, you cannot rely on Cable or Network News to give you credible information... so why watch?

Sandy Hook, the Boston Marathon... The flurry of misinformation and in some cases dis-information is obvious. You hear someone was arrested and not arrested, suspects found or not found, places on lock-down or not... is this all designed just to instill fear and confusion? Or do they truly not know what the hell they are talking about?

From the shady characters apprehended in the woods near Sandy Hook School to the hooded shadowy figure on a rooftop by the bombings... we do not get the honest truth... just video and images and a lot of garbage commentary to go along with it.

The "News" freely makes announcements of information that is incorrect, confused, continually "breaking", and biased as well.   It didn't take CNN and other biased "news" outlets to start making wild suppositions that the Boston Bomber or bombers were some "Right Wing Extremists" ... in fact it's almost like they have been praying for that to be so - and this type of biased speculation is considered News?

Shortly after the bombings - at 5 PM -  I was driving in my car and CBS radio news on WTIC 1080 News had a report via their sister station in Boston, and the broadcaster was saying something along the lines of ... "well, it's Patriot's day so this bombing might have something to do with a domestic terrorist who may be linked to some militia group"... I almost drove off the road I was so damn mad.
How is this unprofessional speculation and biased opinion considered "News"? It's not even fact... it's mere conjecture.  The newscaster said, "There are no facts that brought us to that conclusion but we feel it would be a mistake to rule it out." What kind of garbage "reporting" is that?

And at what point do we, Conservative people in this country, file a class action lawsuit against CNN, Wolf Blitzer, The New York Times, MSNBC et. al. for their consistent and outrageous defamations and libels with knowing malicious intent?   

Their desire to control public opinion and direct false narratives is obvious. The recent gun control issue is a prime example.  The constant barrage of anti-gun messaging - peppered with lies and myths - is designed to brainwash the public at large to be anti-gun, much like the anti-smoking campaigns of the 80's and 90's. AG Eric Holder stated unequivocally that the population must be brainwashed in this manner regarding so-called "gun control" (which is merely citizen disarmament).   

Getting back to the News...Are ratings more important than accuracy?
Should we allow ourselves to be pulled into urgent breaking News reports that are merely time wasting trash talk? 


Whatever happened to careful reporting .. where facts mattered and information was verified and validated?
Whatever happened to newscasters that gave facts instead of biased speculation?
Whatever happened to reports that are meaningful? and truthful?

Every second we are bombarded with "breaking news" or "alerts" or some other made up level of "urgency".... and yet it is recycled information that is most likely incorrect.

And then they have the audacity to blame it on "the fog of confusion" because everything is happening so quickly.

But even when they say something that is wrong - they hardly ever retract it.
They just blame it on "conflicting reports".

Well, isn't it their job to sort out the correct story before saying anything?
And worse than that, they keep repeating misinformation for public consumption.

This isn't NEWS.
This is Garbage.

As consumers of news we ought to demand reliable reporting.
We ought to pull ourselves away from the constant barrage of misinformation from these boneheaded newscasters who spew out nonsense and suppositions and wait for the press conferences or first hand eyewitness accounts.       

Contact your local radio and TV news and demand accurate reporting.
Tell them we have had enough of the sensationalistic crap.
Tell them that as newsmen and women that their responsibility is to deliver truthful and accurate information to their viewers.
Otherwise it isn't News.... it's just making stuff up, either to get ratings or to control thought.



 

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Well-Regulated


For all of those Leftists who are trying to twist and mis-represent the term "well regulated" in the 2nd Amendment to mean that we should have laws restricting, or regulating, gun use... . here is the REAL meaning of what well regulated actually means...

The meaning of the phrase "well-regulated" in the 2nd amendment

From: Brian T. Halonen 

The following are taken from the Oxford English Dictionary, and bracket in time the writing of the 2nd amendment:
1709: "If a liberal Education has formed in us well-regulated Appetites and worthy Inclinations."
1714: "The practice of all well-regulated courts of justice in the world."
1812: "The equation of time ... is the adjustment of the difference of time as shown by a well-regulated clock and a true sun dial."
1848: "A remissness for which I am sure every well-regulated person will blame the Mayor."
1862: "It appeared to her well-regulated mind, like a clandestine proceeding."
1894: "The newspaper, a never wanting adjunct to every well-regulated American embryo city."
The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.


Just sayin'

More about the Constitution here.

Monday, April 15, 2013

CT E-CERT Anti-Gun Bill Passed Illegally?


Sec. 2-26. Printing and electronic availability of bills prior to passage. At each regular or special session of the General Assembly no bill shall be passed or become a law unless it has been printed in its final form, as prescribed by section 2-24, with the exception of germane amendments, and made available in electronic version on the Internet web site of the General Assembly at least two legislative days prior to its final passage, unless the president pro tempore of the Senate and the speaker of the House of Representatives have certified, in writing, the facts which in their opinion necessitate an immediate vote on such bill, in which case it shall nevertheless be upon the desks of the members or available electronically to the members in final form, accompanied by the fiscal note required by section 2-24 when applicable, with the exception of germane amendments, but not necessarily printed, before its final passage.
CT's statutes are clear and it seems that President Pro Tem Don Williams and Speaker of the House Sharkey hastily put forth an "Emergency Certified" Bill which had no facts attached to them regarding reasons why said bill needed an immediate vote. This bill was rushed through to avoid hearings on this 135+ page piece of legislation.

Nothing in the E-Cert document states the reason for the emergency.. Read it here

As a result - besides being un-Constitutional, many of the bill's provisions do not make practical sense and some cannot be enforced... but mostly this bill does nothing to prevent another Newtown from happening.  There was nothing substantive with regard to mental health or school safety in this bill - which should have been the key focus of preventing this type of mass murder. Vetting this bill with public hearings would have shaken out all of the bugs.

Please view the video here on Face the State - Attorney Peter Sachs explains how this new anti-gun bill may in fact be null and void.